Skip to content

Smallmouth Bass Research Paper

1. Tufts BL, Holden J, DeMille M. Benefits arising from sustainable use of North America’s fishery resources: economic and conservation impacts of recreational angling. International Journal of Environmental Studies. 2015;72(5):850–868.

2. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2010 Survey of Recreational Fishing in Canada. Available from

3. Schramm HL Jr, Armstrong ML, Funicelli NA, Green DM, Lee DP, Manns RE Jr, et al. The status of competitive sport fishing in North America. Fisheries. 1991. May 1;16(3):4–12.

4. Funnell E. The Smallmouth Bass in Ontario. Biodiversity Brach Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario; 2012. p. 61.

5. Kerr S. A survey of 2008 competitive fishing events in Ontario. Fisheries Policy Section Biodiversity Branch Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario; 2008. p. 8.

6. Hecky RE, Smith RE, Barton DR, Guildford SJ, Taylor WD, Charlton MN, et al. The nearshore phosphorus shunt: a consequence of ecosystem engineering by dreissenids in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2004;61(7):1285–1293.

7. Kornis MS, Mercado‐Silva N, Vander Zanden MJ. Twenty years of invasion: a review of round goby Neogobius melanostomus biology, spread and ecological implications. Journal of Fish Biology. 2012. February 1;80(2):235–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03157.x[PubMed]

8. Taraborelli AC, Fox MG, Johnson TB, Schaner T. Round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) population structure, biomass, prey consumption and mortality from predation in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2010. December;36(4):625–32.

9. Crane DP, Farrell JM, Einhouse DW, Lantry JR, Markham JL. Trends in body condition of native piscivores following invasion of Lakes Erie and Ontario by the round goby. Freshwater Biology. 2015. January 1;60(1):111–24.

10. Steinhart GB, Marschall EA, Stein RA. Round goby predation on smallmouth bass offspring in nests during simulated catch-and-release angling. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 2004. January 1;133(1):121–31.

11. Lantry JR. Eastern Basin of Lake Ontario Warmwater Fisheries Assessment, 1976–2014. 2014 annual report, Bureau of Fisheries, Lake Ontario Unit and St. Lawrence River Unit to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s Lake Ontario Committee; 2015. Sec. 4, pp. 1–35. Available from

12. Moritz C, Cicero C. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLOS Biology. 2004. September 28;2(10):e354 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354[PMC free article][PubMed]

13. Symondson WO. Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Molecular Ecology. 2002. April 1;11(4):627–41. [PubMed]

14. Dunn MR, Szabo A, McVeagh MS, Smith PJ. The diet of deepwater sharks and the benefits of using DNA identification of prey. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 2010. July 31;57(7):923–30.

15. Molnár G, Tölg I. Relation between water temperature and gastric digestion of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides Lacepede). Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada. 1962. June 1;19(6):1005–12.

16. Jang MH, Joo GJ, Lucas MC. Diet of introduced largemouth bass in Korean rivers and potential interactions with native fishes. Ecology of Freshwater Fish. 2006. September 1;15(3):315–20.

17. Carreon‐Martinez L, Johnson TB, Ludsin SA, Heath DD. Utilization of stomach content DNA to determine diet diversity in piscivorous fishes. Journal of Fish Biology. 2011. April 1;78(4):1170–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.02925.x[PubMed]

18. Barnett A, Redd KS, Frusher SD, Stevens JD, Semmens JM. Non-lethal method to obtain stomach samples from a large marine predator and the use of DNA analysis to improve dietary information. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2010. September 30;393(1):188–92.

19. Méheust E, Alfonsi E, Le Ménec P, Hassani S, Jung JL. DNA barcoding for the identification of soft remains of prey in the stomach contents of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Marine Biology Research. 2015. April 21;11(4):385–95.

20. Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLOS Biology. 2004. September 28;2(10):e312 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312[PMC free article][PubMed]

21. Meyer CP, Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLOS Biology. 2005. November 29;3(12):e422 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422[PMC free article][PubMed]

22. Costa FO, DeWaard JR, Boutillier J, Ratnasingham S, Dooh RT, Hajibabaei M, et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes: the case of the Crustacea. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2007. February 1;64(2):272–95.

23. Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PD. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2007. July 1;7(4):544–8.

24. Kohout J, Pekárik L, Šedivá A, Didenko A, Čiampor F, Čiamporová‐Zaťovičová Z. Discrimination between invasive Ponto‐Caspian gobies using a PCR‐RFLP method. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2014. February 1;30(1):121–6.

25. Paquin MM, Buckley TW, Hibpshman RE, Canino MF. DNA-based identification methods of prey fish from stomach contents of 12 species of eastern North Pacific groundfish. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 2014. March 31;85:110–7.

26. Armani A, Giusti A, Guardone L, Castigliego L, Gianfaldoni D, Guidi A. Universal Primers Used for Species Identification of Foodstuff of Animal Origin: Effects of Oligonucleotide Tails on PCR Amplification and Sequencing Performance. Food Analytical Methods. 2016. May 1;9(5):1199–209.

27. Deagle BE, Tollit DJ, Jarman SN, Hindell MA, Trites AW, Gales NJ. Molecular scatology as a tool to study diet: analysis of prey DNA in scats from captive Steller sea lions. Molecular Ecology. 2005. May 1;14(6):1831–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02531.x[PubMed]

28. Valdez-Moreno M, Quintal-Lizama C, Gómez-Lozano R, del Carmen García-Rivas M. Monitoring an alien invasion: DNA barcoding and the identification of lionfish and their prey on coral reefs of the Mexican Caribbean. PLOS ONE. 2012. June 1;7(6):e36636 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036636[PMC free article][PubMed]

29. Vestheim H, Jarman SN. Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples–a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Frontiers in Zoology. 2008. July 20;5(1):1. [PMC free article][PubMed]

30. Leray M, Agudelo N, Mills SC, Meyer CP. Effectiveness of annealing blocking primers versus restriction enzymes for characterization of generalist diets: unexpected prey revealed in the gut contents of two coral reef fish species. PLOS ONE. 2013. April 8;8(4):e58076 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058076[PMC free article][PubMed]

31. Murray DC, Bunce M, Cannell BL, Oliver R, Houston J, White NE, et al. DNA-based faecal dietary analysis: a comparison of qPCR and high throughput sequencing approaches. PLOS ONE. 2011. October 6;6(10):e25776 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025776[PMC free article][PubMed]

32. Jo H, Gim JA, Jeong KS, Kim HS, Joo GJ. Application of DNA barcoding for identification of freshwater carnivorous fish diets: Is number of prey items dependent on size class for Micropterus salmoides?. Ecology and Evolution. 2014. January 1;4(2):219–29. doi: 10.1002/ece3.921[PMC free article][PubMed]

33. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta. 1978. May 31;42(5):495–506.

34. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S. Influence of diet on the distribution of nitrogen isotopes in animals. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta. 1981. March 31;45(3):341–51.

35. Hecky RE, Hesslein RH. Contributions of benthic algae to lake food webs as revealed by stable isotope analysis. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 1995. December 1:631–53.

36. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB. Food web perspectives on studies of bass populations in north-temperate lakes. In American Fisheries Society Symposium; 2002. Vol. 31, pp. 173–184.



Although oxygen is essential for all aerobic life on the planet, the dependence of vertebrates upon oxygen for most physiological processes comes at a cost. A small portion of the oxygen used for metabolic processes is converted into harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Apel and Hirt, 2004). ROS are continuously produced in all tissues of vertebrates during normal metabolism and are capable of travelling in both the circulatory and lymphatic systems (Valko et al., 2007). Although subcellular components, such as DNA, proteins and lipids, are susceptible to attack by ROS, cells have developed effective mechanisms to prevent this damage, repair this damage or both. Antioxidants play an essential role in maintaining ROS at low levels within the cell (Sies, 1997). Oxidative stress can arise as a result of a homeostatic imbalance between the production of ROS and their detoxification by specific degradative enzymes, antioxidant vitamins and other radical scavengers (Lesser, 2006; Sies, 2000). It is important to note, however, that the antioxidant capacity of an organism may not be an accurate indicator of oxidative stress; an organism with a high antioxidant capacity may still exhibit oxidative stress if they also face high ROS production (Costantini and Verhulst, 2009). Furthermore, oxidative stress can be tissue specific with levels of oxidative damage, ROS and antioxidant defences varying across different organs of multicellular organisms (Kammer et al., 2011; Oruc et al., 2004).

The oxidative status of an organism can be affected by various environmental factors. For example, exogenous antioxidants, some of which are obtained exclusively from diet, have been shown to have positive impacts on lifespan in numerous model organisms, such as Mus musculus, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, as reviewed by Sadowska-Bartosz and Bartosz (2014). Studies have found increases in the biomarkers of oxidative damage as a result of higher predation threat in the Catarina scallop (Argopecten ventricosus; Guerra et al., 2013) and damselfly larvae (Enallagma cyathigerum; Guerra et al., 2013; Janssens and Stoks, 2013). Levels of oxidative stress have also been shown to increase in fish living outside of their thermal optima (Vinagre et al., 2012). The contraction of skeletal muscles during exercise naturally generates ROS that are a product of that contraction, and in rats prolonged exercise and excess ROS cause oxidative stress to that muscle tissue (Powers and Jackson, 2008). Hypoxic stress also results in the release of ROS from mitochondria in multiple species (Murphy, 2009). Finally, a variety of different anthropogenic factors, including pesticides (Slaninova et al., 2009) and metals (Sevcikova et al., 2011), can also influence the oxidative status of fish. In summary, it is clear that oxidative stress plays a role in the ecology of wild animals and, as a result, there has been increasing interest in understanding this ‘oxidative ecology’ (Beaulieu et al., 2013), particularly during challenging life-history periods such as reproduction.

For any organism, reproduction is a major life-history event that also comes at a cost (Bell, 1980; Reznick, 1985), thereby providing a classic example of a life-history trade-off, i.e. the use of finite resources for current reproductive efforts versus saving those resources for investment in future reproductive opportunities (Williams, 1966). This trade-off is particularly relevant for animals that provide parental care, given their potential requirement for high investments of energy and resources during reproduction (Trivers, 1972). Recently, the association of oxidative stress with reproduction has been investigated in a number of organisms, including the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus; Garratt et al., 2011), the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata; Alonso-Alvarez et al., 2010) and the smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu; Wilson et al., 2012). The relationship between oxidative stress and reproduction is complex and context dependent and, depending on the species and environmental conditions, oxidative stress may have either a stimulatory or inhibitory effect on reproduction. In fact, it may be that oxidative stress is a result of reproduction itself (Metcalfe and Alonso-Alvarez, 2010) or that reproduction protects an individual against oxidative stress (Costantini et al., 2014).

In teleost fish, parental care is often undertaken by males (Blumer, 1979; Breder, 1936; Smith and Wootton, 1995). The smallmouth bass is a freshwater fish species in which only the males exhibit nest- and brood-guarding behaviour. This paternal care requires the significant investment of energy and resources from the male for up to four weeks, until the offspring are able to feed and evade predators (Brown, 1984; Cooke et al., 2002; Ridgway, 1988). Caring for the brood entails nest maintenance, oxygenation of eggs and recently hatched larvae, and protection from potential brood predators, which limits feeding by the male while at the same time requiring the male to be significantly more active (Cooke et al., 2002; Hanson et al., 2009). Due to a variety of circumstances, the male may choose to abandon its brood before the offspring reach independence, resulting in the predation of the entire brood and hence an unsuccessful reproductive attempt (Steinhart et al., 2008). This post-spawning life-history decision for male smallmouth bass (i.e. whether to continue guarding its brood or to abandon it) rests upon the male's assessment of the value of that current brood compared with the expected value of its future broods (Williams, 1966). For smallmouth bass, mating success (i.e. the number of eggs deposited in the nest) is a good indicator of current brood value and, as expected, parental males invest more energy in defending larger broods (Ridgway, 1988; Suski et al., 2003). The self-assessment of an individual male's future reproductive opportunities, however, is more complex and likely to be related to the age, size and physiological status of the parental male, which in turn is affected by the individual's age at maturation and previous reproductive history. Smallmouth bass can mature at various ages both within and among populations, from as young as 2–3 years to as old as 6–7 years (Barthel et al., 2008), which can result in an array of different growth trajectories and longevity expectations. In general, if age at maturation is similar among males within a population, then younger (and smaller) males usually have less valuable current broods (i.e. they receive fewer eggs) when compared with older (and larger) males. At the same time, however, these younger, smaller males would expect to have greater opportunities for future reproduction, simply because they presumably would have a longer period until senescence. All other considerations being equal, the younger, smaller males would, therefore, be expected to abandon their nests more readily than larger, older ones. In addition, because of allometric differences in their energy stores (Mackereth et al., 1999), smaller males also acquire relatively more physiological costs during parental care than larger males (Hanson and Cooke, 2009), creating a difference in their survival probability to the next year (Suski and Ridgway, 2007). These smaller, younger males increase their survival likelihood both by spawning later in the season, when water temperatures are higher (and developmental rates of offspring are faster) and by curtailing their parental care activities somewhat sooner than larger, older males. Both of these strategies, however, reduce the relative survival of their brood (Parkos et al., 2011). As a result, smaller, younger males that spawn and provide enough parental care to raise their broods to independence, do so even though, when compared with their larger and older counterparts in that same population, the probability of their survival to spawn again and the value of their current brood size are both lower than for older, larger males.

Here, we explore the role that oxidative stress might play in the complex reproductive ecology of smallmouth bass, M. dolomieu Lacepède 1802. We propose that oxidative stress may be correlated with life-history traits, such as male age and reproductive history. As oxidative stress results in a lowered physiological condition for parental care-providing smallmouth bass (i.e. due to the deleterious effects of ROS damage at both the cellular and organismal levels), oxidative stress may, therefore, provide the physiological mechanism driving life-history trade-offs (Birnie-Gauvin et al., 2017) such as the decision of whether or not to spawn in the spring, as well as the decision of each male that did spawn whether to continue to guard or to abandon its brood throughout the parental care period. In this study, we considered the following alternative hypotheses for oxidative stress relative to life history at the beginning of the parental care period in smallmouth bass, outlined below.

The null hypothesis is that oxidative stress plays no role in the life-history decision of male smallmouth bass. It may also be possible that these males require a certain threshold level of oxidative stress to serve as a signal for them to initiate spawning. In either case, in a given smallmouth bass population, the null hypothesis would predict that at the beginning of the reproductive season, oxidative stress levels would be similar among all of the males that choose to spawn, regardless of size or age. However, if oxidative stress does play a role in the reproductive ecology of smallmouth bass, we would expect that oxidative stress would be correlated to male age and reproductive experience, and would be predictive of whether parental males ultimately abandon or succeed in their reproductive attempts. We therefore propose two alternative hypotheses that take this theory into consideration.

Our first alternative hypothesis is that the ability to reduce oxidative stress by lowering ROS increases with age, prior reproductive experience or both, and provides different starting points for individual males of different ages and experience levels as they begin spawning activities. The relationship between oxidative stress and age is complex and not fully understood (Lapointe and Hekimi, 2010), and oxidative stress has been shown to decrease in older individuals in other species such as the rhesus macaque (Georgiev et al., 2015) and the zebra finch (Alonso-Alvarez et al., 2010). Under this hypothesis, we theorise that oxidative stress levels in nest-guarding fish accumulate over the reproductive period and ultimately act as a trigger to terminate parental care when they reach a certain level. For example, older, larger male smallmouth bass may come out of the overwintering period with lower oxidative stress than younger, smaller males. Older males may therefore initiate spawning with lower levels of oxidative stress than smaller, younger ones and would therefore be capable of accumulating more oxidative stress during parental care before they reach some physiological threshold that would trigger a decision to abandon the brood. This hypothesis predicts that those males with the lowest levels of oxidative stress at the initiation of spawning activities would be older fish that, because of these low initial oxidative stress levels, would be able to invest in their broods for longer and would be less likely to abandon their broods prematurely.

Our second alternative hypothesis is that oxidative stress might accumulate with age, prior reproductive experience or both, providing different starting points for individual males of different ages and prior experience as they begin spawning activities [i.e. an idea that stems from both the free radical theory of ageing (Harman, 1956) and the mitochondrial theory of ageing (Wei et al., 2001; but also see review by Metcalfe and Alonso-Alvarez, 2010)], and it is this variation that influences the life-history decision to stay or leave the brood (i.e. the levels of initial oxidative stress inform the individual of its ‘relative age’ and hence its likelihood for survival to the next year). This hypothesis predicts that those males with the highest levels of oxidative stress at the initiation of spawning activities would be older, more experienced fish. These fish, however, still choose to invest in their broods longer, because those high levels inform them of their lowered probability for survival and future reproductive efforts.


Study site, study animals and sampling procedure

The fish used in the current study were parental care-providing males captured in Miller's Lake, part of the Mississippi River system in eastern Ontario, Canada (44°56′26.5″N, 76°41′55.0″W). This population has been the subject of a long-term (>20 years) study on the reproductive ecology of smallmouth bass, and the reproductive history of all adult males reproducing in the system is known for the study period (Barthel et al., 2008). For a full description of the study site, see Barthel et al. (2008). Briefly, the study site is composed of distinct upstream riverine (Mississippi River) and downstream lacustrine (Miller's Lake) habitats, separated by a 1 m waterfall that is not a complete barrier to smallmouth bass movement. The study site is bordered upstream by a 12 m waterfall and downstream by an extensive series of rapids and waterfalls, both of which serve as barriers to at least upstream movement. Radio telemetry studies have not detected fish movement out of the study site in either direction (Barthel et al., 2008). The study site is relatively isolated and receives negligible fishing pressure.

Fish used in the current study represent a subset of the fish used by O'Connor et al. (2012) to determine associations between life history and plasma physiology. As these fish are part of a long-term study population, it was necessary for all sampling to be non-lethal, and so only plasma samples were obtained. If we had used a lethal sampling approach to obtain tissues such as heart, brain or liver, we would have removed the majority of nesting bass for a given year, which would have serious ecological consequences. Previous studies have used plasma for the assessment of oxidative protection and damage (reviewed in Birnie-Gauvin et al., 2017), including research on nesting bass (see Wilson et al., 2012). In addition, other studies on teleost fish have compared different tissues and revealed that plasma concentrations are related to those in other tissues (Taylor et al., 2015).

For full details of the study and the sampling procedures, see O'Connor et al. (2012). Briefly, in May and June 2009, snorkellers identified parental males on nests. Only those fish guarding fresh eggs (<24 h old) were selected for sampling; this timing was required to account for decreases in androgen concentration over the course of parental care (O'Connor et al., 2011). The snorkeller assigned an egg score to each nest; the egg score is between 1 and 5, and indicates relative egg number, with 1 indicating few eggs and 5 indicating a large number of eggs (Stein and Philipp, 2015). Nest-guarding males were then caught using targeted rod and reel angling, and blood plasma samples were obtained using caudal puncture and lithium-heparinised 3 ml Vacutainer-style syringes (Becton, Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Separated plasma samples (initially frozen in liquid nitrogen in the field and then transferred to a −80°C freezer) were used to determine circulating concentrations of androgens and cortisol for a previous study (O'Connor et al., 2012), and antioxidant capacity and oxidative damage in the current study. Scales were collected to allow determination of age, and water temperature was recorded before the fish was released.

Smallmouth bass reproduce in both the river and lake habitats and tend to show high nest-site fidelity (Barthel et al., 2008). Parental males in the two habitats differ in physiology (O'Connor et al., 2012) and life history (Barthel et al., 2008; O'Connor et al., 2012). For simplicity, and to eliminate any discrepancies caused by nesting location, only the fish from Miller's Lake were used in the current study, resulting in a sample size of N=57 individuals. See Table 1 for measured characteristics from these fish.

Table 1.

Summary of life history and physiological data collected from parental care-providing male smallmouth bass from Miller's Lake, ON, Canada (N=57)

Antioxidant capacity

Antioxidant capacity was determined using the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay as described by Gliwa et al. (2011). Reactions were carried out in triplicate in 96-well Costar microplates to develop fluorescence decay curves using a fluorometric microplate reader (flX800 Multi-Detection Microplate Reader; Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA), measuring excitation and emission peaks at 485 nm and 528 nm, respectively, using Gen5 software (Biotek). Potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was used to prepare other necessary solutions and as a diluting agent. Owing to the high antioxidant capacity of the plasma samples, dilutions of 1:200 were necessary. Aliquots (20 µl) of diluted samples were added in triplicate to the wells. A standard curve was prepared by adding 20 µl of a synthetic antioxidant, Trolox (prepared to concentrations of 100 µmol l−1, 50 µmol l−1, 25 µmol l−1, 12.5 µmol l−1 and 6 µmol l−1), in triplicate to the wells. Potassium phosphate buffer (20 µl) served as a blank and rutin (200 µmol l−1, 20 µmol l−1 and 10 µmol l−1) functioned as a positive control. Working fluorescein solution (120 µl), prepared to a final concentration of 0.129 µmol l−1 from a concentrated stock solution, was added to each well using a multichannel pipette. The plate was then warmed to 37°C by the microplate reader and incubated at this temperature for 20 min. Following this incubation period, 60 µl of 0.16 µmol l−1 2,2′-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride was rapidly added to each well and the plate was placed back in the microplate reader. The plate was shaken vigorously for 15 s before fluorescence was read every 60 s for 50 min. Only the inner 60 wells were used to prevent temperature from having an effect on the outer wells. Protein concentration of each plasma sample (1:200 dilution) was subsequently determined using the BCA assay (Smith et al., 1985).

DNA oxidative damage

Oxidative damage to DNA was quantified by measuring the amount of three oxidised guanine species in plasma: 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG; DNA), 8-hydroxyguanosine (RNA) and 8-hydroxyguanine (DNA/RNA). The concentrations of these species were determined using a DNA/RNA oxidative damage enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, catalogue number: 589320). No pre-assay preparation of the sample was required but the plasma was diluted 1:20 using reconstituted EIA buffer to compensate for the high concentration of 8-OHdG present. Diluted samples (50 µl) were then added, in triplicate, to the goat anti-mouse IgG-coated plate. EIA standards were prepared at decreasing concentrations (3000, 1333, 592.6, 263.4, 117.1, 52.0, 23.1 and 10.3 pg ml−1) by serial dilution with the EIA buffer; 50 µl of these standards were also run on the plate in triplicate. Two blank wells and one well for determination of total activity were included on the plate. Two non-specific binding wells, containing 100 µl EIA buffer, were included as negative controls. Maximum binding wells that contained 50 µl of EIA buffer were run in duplicate. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) tracer solution (50 µl) was added to each well except those used for measurement of total activity and the blank well. Monoclonal antibody solution (50 µl) was then added to each well with the exception of the blank, wells for totally activity and wells for non-specific binding. The plates were then covered for an 18 h incubation period at 4°C. The wells were emptied and rinsed five times with the wash buffer. Reconstituted Ellman's Reagent (200 µl) was then added to each well and 5 µl of the AChE tracer solution was added to the total activity well only. The plate was then shielded from the light and placed on an orbital shaker for 90 min to allow optimum development of colour. Finally, absorbance of the wells was measured at 412 nm on an Epoch microplate reader (Biotek) using Gen5 Data Analysis Software (2.00.18, Biotek).

Protein carbonyl content (PCC) analysis

Protein carbonyl groups were analysed using a Biocell protein carbonyl enzyme ELISA assay kit (Northwest Life Science Specialities, Vancouver, WA, USA, catalogue number: BPCK01) as a measure of protein oxidative damage. Protein concentration of the plasma samples was predetermined using the BCA assay (Smith et al., 1985); 5 µl of the sample was then appropriately diluted in 200 µl dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNP) solution. Diluted plasma samples (200 µl) were added to each well. A standard curve was also prepared using six oxidised protein standards. Each sample and standard was run in triplicate on the plate. The plate was then sealed and incubated at 4°C for 18 h. EIA buffer (300 µl) was used to wash the wells five times. Diluted blocking solution (250 µl) was added to each well followed by a 30 min incubation period at room temperature. The wells were then washed with EIA buffer as before. Anti-DNP-biotin-antibody (200 µl) was added to each well and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h; this was again followed by the wash procedure described above. Finally, 200 µl of streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase was added to each well, incubated for 1 h at room temperature, then subsequently washed using the previously described method. Chromatin reagent (200 µl) was added to each well to allow for colour development. The reaction was followed at 650 nm on the Epoch microplate reader (Biotek) until the highest concentration standard reached an absorbance of 0.5. At this point the reaction was inhibited using 100 µl of the stopping reagent, resulting in a colour and absorbance change that was measured at 450 nm on the microplate reader.

Statistical analysis

Previous research in this system has shown that there are correlations among many of the life-history variables, e.g. older males are also larger, have more reproductive experience, have nests with higher egg scores and tend to nest earlier in the year at cooler water temperatures than smaller males (Barthel et al., 2008; O'Connor et al., 2012). To assess our alternative hypotheses, while also taking into account the known correlations among measured variables, we used two statistical approaches. First, we used univariate Spearman rank correlations to assess the pairwise correlations between observed variables (male age, number of previous nests, total length, egg score and water temperature) and our measured oxidative stress parameters (antioxidant capacity, protein oxidative damage and DNA oxidative damage). Additionally, we used a logistic regression approach to test for the effect each of our three oxidative stress parameters had on the success of the nesting period for each individual fish.

Second, we used a structural equation modelling approach. This approach is based on a multi-step process (Grace et al., 2010; Iriondo et al., 2003). First, the hypotheses are translated into a conceptual model of expected cause-and-effect relationships. In this case, we predicted that life history might influence oxidative stress, and both life history and oxidative stress might influence nest success. We also took into account that in this system, life history influences water temperature at nesting (i.e. older, larger males tend to nest earlier in the year at cooler water temperatures) and, as a result, we predicted that water temperature might influence oxidative stress, as well as nest success. As the second step in this process, we determined which parameters of the conceptual model could be derived through observed variables. In this case, life history can be derived from male age, male body size (i.e. total length), male reproductive experience (i.e. the number of previous nests) and egg score. Oxidative stress can be derived from antioxidant capacity (i.e. ORAC) and oxidative damage (i.e. 8-OHdG and PCC). Nest success and water temperature can be directly measured. Variables that cannot be directly measured, but are inferred through observed variables (i.e. life history and oxidative stress), are latent variables. See Fig. 2A for the completed conceptual model, with latent and observed variables, as well as the predicted relationships among these variables. Once we had built our conceptual model, we then used the structural equation modelling function in the ‘lavaan’ package (Rosseel, 2012) to assess the fit of our observed data to the conceptual model. To make effect sizes comparable for all variables, data were scaled and centred prior to analysis. All analyses were conducted using R version 3.2.1 within R Studio (RStudio, Boston, MA, USA).


Univariate analysis

Consistent with previous studies (i.e. Barthel et al., 2008; O'Connor et al., 2012), we found strong correlations between many of our life-history and environmental variables (Table 2); older fish were also larger, had a greater number of previous nests, had higher egg scores and were more likely to nest in cooler water temperatures.

With respect to oxidative stress, we found a significant, negative correlation between antioxidant capacity (i.e. ORAC) and DNA oxidative damage (i.e. 8-OHdG), such that individuals with a higher plasma antioxidant capacity also exhibited lower levels of DNA oxidative damage (Table 2). Interestingly, we found the reverse relationship between antioxidant capacity and protein oxidative damage (i.e. PCC), such that individuals with a higher antioxidant capacity also had higher protein oxidative damage; DNA oxidative damage and protein oxidative damage were not correlated (Table 2).

Although protein oxidative damage (i.e. PCC) did not significantly correlate with any of our observed life-history variables (Table 2), both antioxidant capacity (i.e. ORAC) and DNA oxidative damage (i.e. 8-OHdG) were correlated with age, number of previous nests, total length and water temperature. Older, larger fish with more reproductive experience nested at cooler temperatures and had both a higher antioxidant capacity and lower DNA oxidative damage (Table 2; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

The relationships between observed variables used to derive ‘life history’ and ‘oxidative stress’. Correlations between antioxidant capacity (A–C) and DNA oxidative damage (D–F) and each of male age, total length and number of previous nests are shown (N=57). Oxidative stress parameter values represent the mean from experiments performed in triplicate. Spearman rank correlations were applied to test for a significant correlation between variables (P-values are presented in Table 2). Relationships between these life-history variables and protein oxidative damage are not included as no significant correlations were detected in our univariate analysis. ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine.

Results from our logistic regressions indicate that neither antioxidant capacity, DNA oxidative damage nor protein oxidative damage played a significant role in determining the success of the reproductive period of the smallmouth bass (Table 3).

Table 2.

Spearman rank correlation coefficients determined between all pairs of observed variables

Table 3.

Logistic regressions investigating the relationship between oxidative stress parameters and the nesting success of paternal smallmouth bass

Structural equation modelling: latent variables

Our overall structural equation model converged normally after 52 iterations (χ2=48.89, d.f.=23, P=0.001). The latent variable ‘life history’ was derived from male age, total length, reproductive history and egg score (Table 4, Fig. 2B), with all variables being positively correlated (Table 4, Fig. 2B). The latent variable ‘oxidative stress’ was derived from ORAC (i.e. a measure of antioxidant capacity) and 8-OHdG (i.e. a measure of oxidative stress); these variables were negatively correlated with one another (Table 4, Fig. 2B). Our measure of protein oxidative damage, PCC, did not significantly contribute to our ‘oxidative stress’ latent variable (Table 4, Fig. 2B).

Table 4.

Parameter estimates for the inference of the latent variable ‘life history’ from observed variables and the inference of the latent variable ‘oxidative stress’ from antioxidant capacity (i.e. ORAC) and oxidative damage (i.e. 8-OHdG and PCC)