Skip to content

Psy 315 Week 2 Individual Assignment Workbook

Psy/315 Week 2 Worksheet Essay

1171 WordsMar 12th, 20165 Pages

University of Phoenix Material- Instructor: Mesha Mathis

Week 2 Practice Worksheet

Prepare a written response to the following questions.

Chapter 3

1. For the following scores, find the mean, median, and the mode. Which would be the most appropriate measure for this data set?

2, 2, 0, 5,1, 4,1, 3, 0, 0, 1, 4, 4, 0,1, 4, 3, 4, 2, 1 Mean- (2+2+0+5+1+4+1+3+0+0+1+4+4+0+1+4+3+4+2+1)/20= 2.15 Median- 2.10 Mode- numbers 1 and 4 The most appropriate measure for this data set would be mean as it involves all the numbers combined.

2. Based on the scale of measurement for each variable listed below, which measure of central tendency is most appropriate for describing the data?

a. The time…show more content…

c. Note the ways in which the means and standard deviations differ, and speculate on the possible meaning of these differences, presuming that they are representative of U.S. governors and large corporations’ CEOs in general. Means are about the same, while the range is twice as wide for CEO’s indicating some CEOs have much larger desks and some have smaller desks.

5. Radel and colleagues (2011) conducted a study of how feeling overly controlled makes you desire—even unconsciously—more freedom. In their study, 52 Canadian undergraduates played a video game in a laboratory and were randomly assigned to either:

a. an automony deprivation condition, in which they were told to follow instructions precisely, constantly given instructions over a loudspeaker, and carefully observed on everything they did. b. a neutral condition, which was much more laid back.

After this activity, they were asked to do a “lexical decision task” (a standard approach for measuring unconscious responses) in which they were shown a series of words and nonwords in random order and had to press “C” if it was a real word or “N” if not. Half of the real words were related to autonomy (e.g., freedom, choice) and half were neutral (e.g., whisper, hammer). The key focus of the study was on how long it took people to press the button *(“response latency”) for each kind of real word, averaged over the many words of each type. The table below

Show More


c."ominal: d.Ratio scale:e.#ontinuous:f.$iscrete:1%. &ollowing are the speeds of '( cars cloced by radar on a particular road in a )%!mph *one ona particular afternoon:)(+ ),+ '2+ ),+ )(+ %2+ ),+ )'+ ),+ ))+ )(+ )2+ )%+ )2+ )-+ )'+ ),+ )1+ )%+ 2(2'+ ',+ 2)+ )1+ )2+ '%+ )'+ )-+ 2+ '(+ )'+ )+ '(+ %2+ )1+ ))+ 1%+ 2-+ ),+ '(/ae a frequency table and a histogram+ then describe the general shape of the distribution21. Rasausas and 0tolt* 2((- ased a group of ' adolescents about their involvement intraditional and electronic bullying. 3he researchers defined electronic bullying as 45a meansof bullying in which peers use electronics 6such as text messages+ emails+ and defaming 7ebsites8 to taunt+ threaten+ harass+ and9or intimidate a peer p.%,%. 3he table below is afrequency table showing the adolescents; reported incidence of being victims or perpetrators or traditional and electronic bullying. a.<sing this table as an example+ explain the idea of a frequency table to a person who has never had a course in statistics. b.Explain the general meaning of the pattern of results.

=ncidence of 3raditional and Electronic >ullying and?ictimi*ation "@'&orms of >ullying

AElectronic victims'1'.3ext!message victim2-)2.1=nternet victim websites+ chatrooms1)1%.%Picture!phone victimB.%3raditional ?ictims,(-1.'Physical victim)'%.23easing victim%(%B.%Rumors victim)2).,Exclusion victim)(%(Electronic >ullies121.'3ext!message bully121.'